Close
This page provides guidance to all researchers in 果冻影院 Department of Science and Technology Studies (STS) on matters of research ethics, data protection, GDPR compliance, and safety.
This page provides material to support STS Research Review Panel, which has responsibilities for research governance within the 果冻影院 Department of Science and Technology Studies (STS).
Key documents
| use this form | which covers this area | because research involves |
|---|---|---|
| Consider methods | methods and protocols | humans are research subjects or information sources;听data collected from or about humans;听specific methods you believe merit independent review |
| Consider data | data protection, storage and management | personal data (as defined by GDPR);听drawing boundaries over privacy;听long-term decisions about management and storage |
| Consider safety | safety and risk assessment | humans as research subjects;听work outside 果冻影院 facilities;听lone working or out-of-hours work (see STS lone working policy); other risks you think need risk assessment |
| guidance | general guidance for all applicants |
Overview
Research cannot be undertaken without necessary approvals in place prior to start. Three areas are prescribed for STS-based research projects:
- ethics of research methods, mandatory for research using humans as data
- data protection, mandatory for research using personal data (as defined by )
- safety and risk assessment, mandatory for off-site locations and lone working
Without exception, all research at 果冻影院 involving 鈥渋ntervention or interaction with living human participants or the collection or study of data derived from living human participants鈥� must receive ethical approval of methods prior to the start of data collection. 果冻影院 also requires approval of plans to protect certain types of data and to assess risks to safety.
STS has created a series of films to help students work through the application elements:
- Introduction to STS research ethics ()
- Consider Methods - STS research ethics ()
- Consider Safety - STS research ethics ()
- Consider Data - STS research ethics ()
Supervisors and line managers are responsible to ensuring projects under their direction meet all 果冻影院 requirements. STS RRP听strongly advises staff and students to secure independent decisions about applicability - meaning you should not make decisions about your own projects (history shows such decisions risk bias) - consult independent colleagues. STS researchers should feel encouraged to discuss project and protocol design with their colleagues, supervisors, and line managers. In teaching, module tutors or supervisors are the first point-of-contact. Research students, research fellows, and other academic staff have recourse to research clusters, especially cluster leads. Our community has tremendous wealth of experience in areas of protocol design and engagement with responsible research.
To secure approvals, researchers may use any one of these three听pathways:
- 果冻影院 REC: In research review, 果冻影院 central processes are supervening and听provide default systems for all research. These are managed by听 (果冻影院 REC). 果冻影院 offers guidance听in all aspects of research preparation, including research ethics, data protection, and safety and risk management. 果冻影院 provides legal guidance on data protection issues.
- STS RRP: Research review within the department is managed by the STS Research Review Panel (STS RRP). Because the central system can seem daunting, and because most STS research involves relatively low risk interventions or collection of non-personal data, STS maintains a streamlined screening process as a preliminary stage in review. The purpose of our local review is to identify, approve, and monitor low risk research and non-personal data collection. Most research involving more-than-minimum risk will be referred to 果冻影院 REC as a matter of routine.
For 2023-24, the RRP lead is Professor Andrew Gregory.
All documentation, requests for approval, and reviews are managed by the STS Research and Finance Administrator, Ms Sue Walsh.
Contact the panel via听STS.Ethics@ucl.ac.uk. - Other departments: STS researchers collaborating with colleagues in other 果冻影院 departments can use alternate review processes within 果冻影院. Approvals from those departments is sufficient. Where comparability or transferability are听not clear, STS researchers听should consult the STS RRP lead.
听