¹û¶³Ó°Ôº

XClose

Predicting Language Outcome and Recovery After Stroke (PLORAS)

Home
Menu

Project Information

Ìý

Professor talking about language recovery
Aphasia recovery

  • AphasiaÌýis aÌýlanguage disorderÌýwhich canÌýoccur afterÌýbrain injury, such as a stroke.
  • People with aphasia can haveÌýdifficultyÌýwithÌýspeaking,Ìýunderstanding,ÌýreadingÌýandÌýwriting. Ìý
  • HavingÌýaphasiaÌýcan beÌýtraumaticÌýandÌýlife-changingÌýforÌýpatientsÌýandÌýrelatives.

What patients and relatives want to know

  • Patients want to know if they will recover, and how long it will take.
  • Currently, it isÌývery difficultÌýtoÌýanswerÌýthis.
  • TheÌýPLORASÌýproject aimsÌýtoÌýsolveÌýthisÌýproblem.

Project aims

Aim 1

ToÌýtell futureÌýstroke survivors:

  • How muchÌýlanguage they areÌýlikely to re-gain.
  • How longÌýthis isÌýlikely to take.

We hope to giveÌýfuture patientsÌýaÌýpredictionÌýabout theirÌýrecovery.

EachÌýpredictionÌýshowsÌýhow much confidence we haveÌýinÌýit.

For example:

  • We areÌýmore confidentÌýifÌý90% of patientsÌýwith theÌýsame strokeÌýareaÌýrecoveredÌýin a particularÌýtime-frame. Ìý
  • We areÌýless confidentÌýif onlyÌý50% of patientsÌýrecoveredÌýin a particularÌýtime-frame.

    Aim 2

    We want toÌýexplain:

    • Why some patientsÌýrespond better to treatmentÌýthan others.
    • Why some patientsÌýrecover more quicklyÌýthan others.

    We hope this information canÌýguide future aphasia therapy.

    Ìý

    Find out more...

    PLORAS aims toÌýcreate a clinical tool for patients and clinicians which will provide individualised predictions about the most likely course of recovery from aphasia after stroke, based on the patient's MRI brain image.

    These predictions are based on the exact location, size and shape of the lesion at a very detailed level. This has become possible due to advances in neuroimaging and computational techniques.ÌýIn practical terms, future patients with aphasia can be shown the rate and level of improvement that other individuals with the same area of brain damage experienced over time.

    Critically, each prediction indicates the level of confidence that we have in it.ÌýFor example, we can be confident when we know that more than 90% of patients with the same lesion site recovered within a particular time frame, but we are less confident if only 50% of patients recovered, because this indicates that the effect of the lesion varies across patients.

    When we are confident in our predictions, we hope to be able to relay encouraging news. E.g. '80% of people with the same stroke site as you recovered their language within 5 years'.

    For other lesion sites, with less consistent outcomes, we are working on ways to improve our knowledge of these lesions and interact with clinicians and patients in ways that are individualised and optimised for the patient and their family.

    Ìý