¹û¶³Ó°Ôº

XClose

¹û¶³Ó°Ôº CULTURE

Home
Menu
Curating Equality
Research hub

¹û¶³Ó°Ôº Art Museum’s Slade Collections (since 1897, c.3000 works):Ìý45% work by women artists


Ìý

About Curating Equality

Curating Equality* is a research hub and virtual platform for interdisciplinary and collaborative research, which uncovers hidden histories in ¹û¶³Ó°Ôºâ€™s collections and addressesÌýtheir contemporary relevance. Projects undertaken to date haveÌýbrought forgotten artists into the limelight, many of them women. Significantly, these projects address currencies of esteem and have uncovered women artists' relationships with peers across disciplines, as well asÌýthe conditions that made it possible for theseÌýartistsÌýto thrive. Exploration of the patterns and systems that underpin visibilityÌýand the impact of newÌýtechnologiesÌýcontinueÌýto inform directions for new research. ¹û¶³Ó°Ôº is well suited to exploring the visibility of women within institutional narratives and British history more widely. The university paved the way to advancements in gender equality in education and research, and was at the vanguard of co-education in art.

*The term Curating Equality was coined by Nina Pearlman and is also the title of her current research.

Curating Equality projects

The suite of Curating Equality projects led by ¹û¶³Ó°Ôº Art Museum includeÌýPrize & PrejudiceÌý(2018), Instruction and Access: Women in art educationÌý(2018),ÌýThe Magic Fruit GardenÌý(2018),ÌýDisrupters and Innovators: Journeys in gender equality at ¹û¶³Ó°ÔºÌý(2018-19),ÌýPassing In: Access and influence in higher educationÌý(2018),ÌýÌýÌý(2019) andÌýRedressÌý(2018).ÌýThese projects draw onÌýthe models and methodologies of earlier initiatives focusing on diversity and inclusion, such as ¹û¶³Ó°Ôº Art Museum’sÌýSpotlight on the Slade CollectionsÌý- aÌýcuratorial research project funded by Paul Mellon Centre for Studies in British Art (2015-2018) - as well as the interdisciplinary project and exhibition, (2012-13).

Further examples of Curating EqualityÌýresearch by ¹û¶³Ó°Ôº staff and students:

  • Curating Equality: a case study for applying predictive technologies to art collections (2002), conference paper, Dr Nina Pearlman, Head of ¹û¶³Ó°Ôº Art CollectionsÌýand Professor Julianne Nyhan,ÌýProfessor of Humanities Data Science and Methodology, TUÌýDarmstadt; Professor of Digital Humanities, ¹û¶³Ó°Ôº, presented at theÌý.Ìý
  • Curating Equality: applying systems thinking to achieve gender balance in the artsÌý(2021), collaborative project led by Dr Nina Pearlman, Head of ¹û¶³Ó°Ôº Art Collections and ProfessorÌýJulianne Nyhan Director ¹û¶³Ó°Ôº Centre for Digital Humanities with research assistant Magdalena Araus Sieber, graduate of ¹û¶³Ó°Ôº Digital Humanities and currently Digital Curator British Museum. This was supported by a ¹û¶³Ó°Ôº Research award to foster interdisciplinary research.Ìý
  • Unseen Women: reframing women artists andÌýcultural agents within the Slade Archive and ¹û¶³Ó°Ôº Art Museum Collection (2021-present)), practice-led PhD project by visual artist , Slade School of Fine Art, ¹û¶³Ó°Ôº. Holly isÌýdiscovering further details about the lives of Slade prize-winning women artists in the ¹û¶³Ó°Ôº Art Museum collection through research in ¹û¶³Ó°Ôº Special Collections and the Slade Archive.ÌýShe is producing digital drawings and text-based artworks in response that raise the visibility of women artists within collections and archival spaces.
  • Ìý(2021), Sabrina Harverson-Hill and Tianyu Zhang, ¹û¶³Ó°Ôº History of Art with Material Studies (HAMS).
  • Ìý(2019), Sarah Waite, Lok Hei Wong, Patricia Roberts and Yiting Fu,Ìý¹û¶³Ó°Ôº Museum Studies, Collections Curatorship course.

Some statistics to date: twenty-sixÌýwomen artists, eleven women fromÌýother fields and sixÌýliving artists are featured across this suite of Curating Equality projects, which incorporateÌýresearch from tenÌýacademics, ten students (BA/MA/PhD) and ten collections and archives.

Affiliated projects

The Curating Equality research hub has alsoÌýsupportedÌýpeers across the university and wider sector in various affiliated projects, including the ¹û¶³Ó°Ôº Rightsholder Clearance Project and Professor Liz Rideal’s , both commissioned as part of the Slade 150 anniversary.

Women Artists at ¹û¶³Ó°Ôº Art Museum

¹û¶³Ó°Ôº Art MuseumÌýis a valuable resource for exploring gender imbalance in the arts.ÌýIts Slade Collections spanÌý150 years and reflect the history of art education at the first art school to admit women on the same terms as men.ÌýSlade Prizes were awarded from 1871 and retained from 1897. In the first year that prizes were awarded, three of the five winners were women and women consistently won prizes at the Slade thereafter.Ìý

The museum has helped restore reputations of artistsÌýlost in the gaps of history through ongoing research, loans and exhibitions working with culturalÌýsector partners as well as students and academics. For instance,Ìý¹û¶³Ó°Ôº Art Museum was the major lender to the first major retrospective of Ìýat Dulwich Picture Gallery in 2016.

Curating Equality projects have enabled us to establish that 45% of the museum's Slade Collections holdings comprise of work by women artists and connect contemporary artistic practice to research in other disciplines.

What can we learn from these collections?

These collections are a valuable resource for understanding currencies of esteem and the career paths of women artists of the past, and that which connects them with their contemporary counterparts. For example, interdisciplinarity, collaboration, education, social and political activism, and public engagement – all now at the forefront of contemporary art practice –Ìýcharacterised the careers of many nineteenth and twentieth century women artists. And yet, the contributions of so many of these artists remain invisible, having failed to be mapped along with their influence and legacies by the generations that followed. Being able to consider the conditions that impacted the professional advancement of women artists who demonstrably out peformed their male peers in art school when the playing field was level sheds light on conditions that perpetuate gender imbalance in the arts today.

The prize-winning drawing by Elinor Monsell (see above slide) would have been one of the first to enter the museum collection in 1898 while recent additions to the collections through the prize system and other methodsÌýinclude work by twenty-first-century award-winning artistsÌý,Ìý, , , Anya Olofgörs and . These acquisitionsÌýsit alongside works by key twentieth-century figures such as , ÌýandÌý.Ìý

The ¹û¶³Ó°Ôº Art MuseumÌýcollectionsÌýofferÌýa unique record of the theory and practice of art education at the Slade from 1897 to the present day.ÌýNo other art school collected in this way.ÌýUnlike other public collections, the Slade Collection was built up through the prize system and thus, the museum holds examples of work by artists before they began their professional careers – with no foreknowledge of their future position within the art world.ÌýTo read more about the history of the Slade and the prize system see the exhibition page forÌýPrize and Prejudice.

A short story about Elinor Monsell: the earliest prize-winner in 1898

Elinor Monsell (1879-1954)

Elinor Monsell’s prize-winning drawing entered the collections in 1898 together with a drawing by . Competing under the same conditions and drawing the same model, both artists shared the first prize that year. We know a lot about Orpen, but at the time of our Spotlight on the Slade research project very littleÌýinformation about Elinor Monsell was available. Research conducted as part of this project revealed that as well as the prize for this work, Monsell was awarded the Slade Scholarship in 1898 and the following year, sheÌýwas awarded 3rd prize equal for Figure Painting and another certificate for Figure Drawing.

Monsell returned to Ireland after leaving the Slade.ÌýShe produced the first press mark for – the organisation founded by Elizabeth Yeats, and she produced a woodcut of Queen Maeve for the , which was used on the programme cover in 1904. Over a century later, this designÌýstill exists today as the theatre’s logo.Ìý Monsell also made illustrations for children’s books written by her husband – amateur golfer, golf writer and Charles Darwin’s grandson .ÌýSignificantly, Monsell taught wood engraving to her husband’s cousin,Ìý, also a Slade student, who went on to become the only female founder member of the Society of Wood Engravers.

What does Monsell’s story tell us and how is it still relevant?

Monsell's story demonstrates the importance of women’s access to the life model andÌýexemplifies the teaching method at the Slade, where the life room was used to explore form, placing emphasis on understanding the figure, rather than producing a finished drawing (as evidenced by the corrections and sketches on the same sheet). Viewed alongside William Orpen's work, Monsell’s drawing tells us about the prize system. Only by studyingÌýthe two drawings together are we able to determine that the two artists drew the same model. An article by a female student in 1883 states that male and female studentsÌý‘compete under precisely the same conditions’ using the same casts and models for the competition subjects.

Questions that arise from this research:

  • To what extent was Monsell’s career affected by her marriage to Bernard Darwin?
  • To what extent has her name change from Monsell to Darwin challenged researchers in mapping her legacy?
  • To what extent did Monsell's interdisciplinarity contribute to, or detract from, opportunities to show her work and establish herselfÌýas an artist?
  • Where is her work today?ÌýA number of drawings have been noted to have surfaced in recent sales however none of her work resides in other public collections.
    Share this: