果冻影院

XClose

果冻影院 Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose

Home
Menu

Amazon鈥檚 Algorithmic Rents: The economics of information on Amazon

Authored by Dr Ilan Strauss, Tim O'Reilly and Professor Mariana Mazzucato

amazons_algorithmic_rents_publications-thumbnail-800x500.png

16 November 2023

Download working paper

果冻影院 Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose (IIPP) Working Paper Series: IIPP WP 2023-12

Authors:

  • Ilan Strauss | Senior Research Associate | 果冻影院 Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose (IIPP)
  • Tim O鈥橰eilly聽| Founder,聽CEO, and Chairman of O鈥橰eilly Media | Visiting Professor of Practice at 果冻影院 Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose聽(IIPP)
  • Mariana Mazzucato聽| Founding Director and Professor in the Economics of Innovation and Public Value | 果冻影院 Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose (IIPP)

Reference:

Strauss, I., O鈥橰eilly, T. and Mazzucato, M. (2023). Amazon鈥檚 Algorithmic Rents: The economics of information on Amazon. 果冻影院 Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose, Working Paper Series (IIPP WP 2023-12). Available at: /bartlett/public-purpose/wp2023-12

Abstract:

Amazon鈥檚 maturing e-commerce platform has seen its business strategy evolve from growth at any cost to a 鈥渜uest for profit鈥, underpinned by its burgeoning $37.7bn advertising business. Through advertising, Amazon compels its captive third-party merchant ecosystem to pay for one of its most valuable assets 鈥 customer attention. Advertising leverages Amazon's unique position as a discovery platform. Discovery is governed by Amazon鈥檚 algorithms 鈥 the nerve centre of its conduct and a critical guide to market structure. Interrogating algorithmic allocations is not a routine part of market investigations, despite being the principal market institution and mechanism coordinating exchange online.

Prevailing doctrine assumes that platform rent extraction via algorithmic allocations to lower quality sponsored output cannot persist since 鈥渃ompetition is just a click away鈥: optimizing users, with negligible search costs, will costlessly seek out higher quality algorithmic search and recommendation results.

We show that antitrust鈥檚 benchmark model of competition, premised on perfect information and consumer rationality, is unable to dissect platform power today, grounded in algorithms exploiting the highly uncertain and informationally abundant decision-making environment. Users, reliant on a platform鈥檚 algorithms for decision-making, may continue to click on inferior quality advertising information when prioritized by the platform. This allows Amazon to extract pecuniary rents from its ecosystem and impair fair competition by making product visibility conditional on payment.

We explore complementary antitrust and consumer protection paradigms for limiting a platform鈥檚 exploitation of its ecosystem through advertising. We focus on the relationship between the level of information and the level of competition in a market. Dominance is when a platform can disregard the full information content of its ecosystem and still profit.聽