果冻影院

The submission was initially sortlisted by聽RIBA in December 2021, and is part of practisingethics.org a collaboration between two long term projects,聽The Bartlett Ethics Commission听补苍诲听聽work package 'Ethics of Research Practice,' led by Jane Rendell.聽We are delighted that the submission has now been in the聽Annual theme: Education.

聽are a pioneering open-access educational tool for emerging and established built environment practitioners to teach themselves and others how to identify ethical dilemmas that may arise in research and practice, negotiate their ethical responsibilities, and rehearse strategies to navigate unpredictable environments with care and creativity. They are designed as an accessible point of reference at all stages of a project 鈥� from planning and conducting activities in the field聽to communicating and staging work. Rather than a regulatory hurdle, they consider ethics as an opportunity to enrich architectural practice through reflexive curiosity and critical investigation.聽

A series of offer insights into how to negotiate the difficult 鈥榚thical moments鈥� that different built environment research methods and contexts pose, and develop an ethical practice as a built environment researcher. They are a pioneering open-access educational tool for emerging and established built environment practitioners to teach themselves and others how to identify ethical dilemmas that may arise in research and practice, negotiate their ethical responsibilities, and rehearse strategies to navigate unpredictable environments with care and creativity.

Insightful and imaginative architectural practice encompasses a range of sites, contexts, and communities, and it is important to consider the benefits, risks, and harms to all connected with and affected by it. 鈥楶ractising Ethics Guides鈥� are the result of an interdisciplinary collaboration between two long term projects exploring ethical protocols for built environment practitioners and strengthening pathways to urban equality, with particular attention to the western-centric bias of ethical values which privilege the individual over the communal or collective. Together, this work illuminates how the relationship between universal ethical principles and specific ethical processes is situated within particular contexts. These guides help navigate this relationship through generative questions as prompts to reflect on potential ethical considerations, guidelines that illuminate concerns, and actions that embody ethical principles.

鈥楶ractising Ethics Guides鈥� offer insights from experienced built environment researchers. They are designed as an accessible point of reference at all stages of a project 鈥� from planning, to conducting activities in the field, to communicating and staging work. Rather than a regulatory hurdle, they consider ethics as an opportunity to enrich architectural practice through reflexive curiosity and critical investigation. Thinking through ethics compels us to grapple with ideas of enduring value, to question our position, and to expound what practitioners we want to be. The guides are shared via an open-access website and have already been embedded across international architectural education programmes.

Find out more about Bartlett shortlisted projects here, and the winning entries .

Image: Judit Ferencz, 鈥淗alima cooking,鈥澛�(2015), pencil on paper, 297 x 420 mm.